Top.Mail.Ru
[tech, pols, current events] 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63: The Revolution will be Dugg. - Sibylla Bostoniensis — LiveJournal
? ?

Sat, May. 5th, 2007, 12:02 am
[tech, pols, current events] 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63: The Revolution will be Dugg.

Because I have been under a crushing pile of school work and am just now emerging a little, I will simply quote the entirety (with permission) of metageek's precis:

  • Someone hacked the master key for the DRM used in HD-DVD and Blu-Ray.
  • The story got posted on Digg.
  • The HD-DVD people sent Digg some sort of demand that they take it down.
  • Digg did so, which they may been legally required to do, and killed the submitter's account, which they were not.
  • People started writing about this censorship on their own blogs.
  • Said blog posts got posted to Digg.
  • Digg took down those posts, too, and killed the accounts of the submitters. (Digg has a history of suppressing criticism of itself, despite its claim to be a purely democratic system.)
  • Some hell broke loose.
  • And then all hell broke loose.

Hard to say who's lost more credibility, the HD DRM people or Digg.

Finally, the founder of Digg conceded to community pressure in his own blog, writing:

But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you've made it clear. You'd rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won't delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be.

If we lose, then what the hell, at least we died trying.

Sat, May. 5th, 2007 06:09 am (UTC)
londo

Those two links are identical.

Also, not being Digg-literate, I can't find a copy of that blog entry, which is sad as I'd like to see it.

Sat, May. 5th, 2007 06:10 am (UTC)
siderea

Fixed, I think.

Sat, May. 5th, 2007 12:55 pm (UTC)
redaxe

There was another high-profile angle to the story. Cory Doctorow, of BoingBoing, had been teaching a class at USC, and maintaining a class blog. One of his students posted the number and Doctorow received a takedown notice from the AACS licensing authority, and he's been publicizing the number, as well as the pages where links to it can be found, since.i

As of the last post he made on the topic, there are over 800,000 pages explicitly stating the number.

I don't know that there's any feedback between the two (i.e., that Digg readers aren't seeing the material at BoingBoing and becoming angered that they were censored), but it certainly helped to keep awareness of the story high.

Sat, May. 5th, 2007 01:35 pm (UTC)
m_danson

Ah... that explains what I saw on ModBlog BZEzine.com.

A guy got that code tattooed on his chest. (site is often not work safe due to contents and the header but the last time I looked this was okay) The question being asked there is whether he could be sued or forced to have the tattoo removed.
(Deleted comment)

Thu, May. 10th, 2007 05:39 pm (UTC)
alierak

And another one.

Tue, May. 8th, 2007 05:16 pm (UTC)
jducoeur

Of course, the *funny* part about the whole thing is that the AACS still believes they can put the genie back in the bottle.

The Digg folks let themselves get panicked by lawyers, but they did realize their mistake in only about a day -- a mistake, but one I can forgive. (When a Big Bad Media Group tells you that they will sue you out of existence, a little panic is a pretty natural response.) But I suspect that it's going to take many months before the AACS figures out that they are Just Plain Screwed. And it's all terribly pathetic, because any security expert worth their salt could have said (and many did) that this was only a matter of time...